Your Gay Marriage Doesn't Threaten My Straight One

First, a disclaimer: I'm single. I'm straight. But my parents are married. That's close enough for me to say to conservatives, "Get a grip."

I have yet to see any evidence, beyond the biblical, that same-sex marriages devalue marriage in general or devalue families. This is the rallying cry made again and again by family and religious organizations.

If you think about it, we don't even need gay marriages to degrade straight ones. We've done that already. We've done it through a 50 percent divorce rate. We've done it through "triple-a:" adultery, abuse, abandonment. We've gotten into committments we weren't ready for, and we refused to let somebody talk us out of them because nobody else is allowed to be judgmental when we're in love. I find it amazing the right wing forgets all of this now.

Instead of denying gay couples a legal right to marry when they are given that right, it's time to improve the marriages we already have, gay or straight. Think about this: you take a test to get a drivers license. You take the bar exam to practice law. You take tests to practice medicine and dispense prescriptions. But aside from a few medical examinations, nobody tests you on your relationship skills before you get a marriage license. It's like getting tags for your dog. No wonder we see so many marriages break up.

I'm interested to see what the divorce rate will be among gay couples, once we've had a few years to study gay marriages. Something tells me it will be lower, mainly because those who are committing to relationships now have been committed unofficially for a long time already. And then maybe the rest of us can get a few clues.

Reel To Reel:
Troy

How It Rates: **1/2
Starring: Brad Pitt, Eric Bana, Orlando Bloom
Rated: R
Red Flags: Ye Olde Graphic War Violence, Brief Sexuality

Preconceived Notions: With a massive, bloated budget, pride cometh before the fall of Troy.
The Bottom Line: It's no Greek tragedy, but it's not a triumph either.

Somewhere in the making of Troy, some Warner Brothers executive had to have looked at the $175 million budget and said, "We're spending how much on this picture? A war over a woman?" And that's the question people still ask when they hear the story of the Trojan War, the triumph of testosterone above everything else.

It all starts when things are looking good. A war-weary Greece has called a truce with Troy. It looks like everybody's going to put down their swords and shields for awhile. That's until Prince Paris of Troy (Bloom) runs off with King Menaleus' wife, Helen. Not a good diplomatic move. Menelaus wants his woman back, and he wants revenge. With the help of his brother, King Agamemnon of the Mycenaeans, he enlists the help of armies across Greece. Agamemnon enlists the help of legendary warrior Achillies (Pitt), a wildcard who fights for nobody but himself and hates Menelaus. Hector (Bana) is the best the Trojans have, and down the line we know these two are gonna tango.

Troy is not history any more than its source material, Homer's Illiad is. It's still an epic, though, in size, in budget, in visuals. This is the kind of film Hollywood used to make before CGI, and people were blown away by it. This is also the kind of film that lends itself nicely to riffing in the style of Mystery Science Theater 3000, with corny elevated dialogue, especially Achilles screaming "Hector!" outside the walls of Troy. Part of me wanted to shout back, "Oh Hector!" like the crowd did to Sonny in Dog Day Afternoon.

Troy's major accomplishment, besides blood-and-guts warfare, is showing how the two toughest kids on the block will go to the wall and kill everybody in the name of honor and their own inflated egos. And yet these same men have some respect for civilized warfare, as a sequence late in the movie shows. They also have a desire to settle things man-to-man instead of army-to-army. But we know all's fair in love and war. For an epic, this sounds all too human.

The film runs long at more than two-and-a-half hours. But it doesn't feel long. Some cuts could have been made, but I'm not sure you would have a better picture for them. Troy wants to be an action movie and a love story at the same time. But it seems like we're only getting half of both.

More movie reviews on FrancisP@ge

Reel To Reel:
Van Helsing

How It Rates: **
Starring: Hugh Jackman, Kate Beckinsale
Rated: PG-13
Red Flags: Horror Violence

Preconceived Notions: Just what we need, another Underworld.
The Bottom Line: Lucent, loud, long, lame.

Van Helsing draws from classic source material. But alas, the filmmakers translated it onto screen as a celluloid haunted house, with shallow story and character development. The plot merely functions as a device to transport us from one CGI action scene to the next, where five will get you ten some window will be broken and somebody is going to be screaming. Pella employees will quake in their seats.

All you really need to know is that the movie centers around famous monster-hunter Van Helsing (Jackman), who's sent to Transylvania to kill Count Dracula. Maybe we should say Helsing... Van Helsing, because you can see a number of rip-offs from the James Bond series. There's a sexy sidekick, Anna Valerious (Beckinsale), who apparently moonlights as a dominatrix when she's not battling evil. And there's a "Q," too, a weapons-guru monk -- excuse me, friar -- who's along for the ride with his incendiary toys. Even Dracula reminds me of the Bond villians, always talking, talking, talking about world domination instead of just dominating. And I challenge you to spot the scene which reminded me of the movie poster of For Your Eyes Only.

Van Helsing suffers from many of the same flaws as last year's League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen. Too much action, not enough coherence. We are presented with a host of characters we don't care enough about, except maybe Frankenstein, because he's such a loveable old monster. Just as we're starting to see some semblence of depth, another effects scene hits us over the head and we're back to page one. Even the characters seem lost in their own movie. They are talking, but I wonder if their lines are coming from a script or from their hearts. And there's a host of peasants with sickles and hammers who have nothing better to do than to hate strangers and serve as lunch for growing vampires (or nookie for the friar, but I digress).

This film could've been a lot better, a la Hellboy. But somebody down the line decided effects were the way to go. Van Helsing comes with a $160 million price tag, and you can see the money on the screen... if some flying vampire doesn't pick it up and crash through a window with it.

More movie reviews on FrancisP@ge

Reel To Reel:
Kill Bill Volume 2

How It Rates: ***
Starring: Uma Thurman, David Carradine, Darryl Hannah
Rated: R
Red Flags: Graphic Violence, Language

Preconceived Notions: Saw Volume 1. Can this be any geekier?
The Bottom Line: No, not really. But there's enough to satisfy those film festish freaks.

Volume 2 of Kill Bill shows what Quentin Tarentino is capable of when he keeps his inner geek restrained. Where Volume 1 was mostly style and sampling, this one's deeper.

Yes, there is a climactic showdown between The Bride (Thurman) and Bill (Carradine). But that showdown unfolds in a manner we have not been groomed for. More satisfying for the blood-and-guts crowd will be the Bride's showdown with Hannah's one-eyed character.

We get more of the backstory we could've used in Volume 1 regarding Bride and Bill. They had a history. They had issues. They had a serious monster of a martial-arts trainer. And they still have some latent affections.

But let's get back to the sampling everybody liked from the first picture. Again, Tarentino drops references to blaxploitation, spaghetti westerns, chop-house and even 70's soul. Yet there's less imitation and more innovation.

Kill Bill would have stunk as a heavily-cut single feature. But I imagine we will eventually get a whopping four-hour version on DVD, along the same lines as The Godfather Saga or Sergio Leone's uncut version of Once Upon A Time In America. Yes, they do make novels for the screen, and this is one of them.

More movie reviews on FrancisP@ge

Signs Of Life...

I admit we've been MIA over the past month or so. Some of that is related to my recent trip to Williamsburg, along with editing work on The Video Diaries: Patriots' Paradise, the DVD chronicle of a very patriotic, uplifting journey. More on that to be chronicled soon. (Email me at cfrancis21 (at) cox.net if you want a copy! :-) ).

So don't fret. We'll be playing catch-up over the next few weeks. I hope. I believe.

Reel To Reel:
The Alamo

How It Rates: ***
Starring: Dennis Quaid, Jason Patric, Billy Bob Thornton
Rated: PG-13
Red Flags: War Violence

Preconceived Notions: Delayed from last year's Christmas-season release. That's not a good sign.
The Bottom Line: Unromantic, just the facts, ma'am treatment of one of history's most famous battles.

You will not forget The Alamo. Now that we've gotten past the predictable cliche, let's talk about what this film is not.

It's not a history film with a tacked-on romantic subplot, like Pearl Harbor.

It's not a gritty, gut-wrenching war picture, like Saving Private Ryan.

It's not a Disney-fied portrayal of an American legend, like Davy Crockett.

I have to wonder if that's by design or result. The making of this film was a battle in itself. Ron Howard moved from directing to producing when studio brass mucked with his vision. Two A-list stars bowed out. The release date was pushed back to accommodate studio demands.

Touchstone ended up with a dazzling yet unglorified picture. The Alamo subtracts from the legend, painting its heroes not as heroes but as a bunch of guys standing up to unbeatable odds. Even Davy Crockett (Billy Bob Thornton) would rather be known as David, or maybe even Dave. Most of what people have heard about him is hype. And that coonskin cap? He's only wearing it for the fans. Col. Jim Bowie (Jason Patric) has his own problems. He's in a struggle to command his ragtag bunch. And he's got TB. The Alamo itself looks like it has already lost the battle from the start.

General Santa Ana, as portrayed here in his fancy bicorn, is a Spanish-speaking Napoleon. His character is not drawn for us any more than absolutely required, and the same goes for his Mexican troops. They at times seemed like they belonged in Attack Of The Clones.

The climatic battle sequence is one of the few I've seen recently where I have not had to wonder at times who is winning and losing, meaning there are no shaky camera shots in the heat of battle. Or maybe I just found a better seat further away from the screen this time. It's worth mentioning, too, that all the battle sequences are relatively bloodless, making this a film that's probably all right for kids under 13 who have some appreciation for history (and know that the Alamo didn't always have the word "dome" after it). And watch for the scene with the cannonball that reminded me of a particular shot from Pearl Harbor.

If a textbook company wanted to make a big-budget historical film, this may be the one they would have made. And no doubt this film, or excerpts, may make its way into a few history classes. No it's not boring. Not by a long shot. But it is also curiously restrained, and for Hollywood, that's a wonder.

More movie reviews on FrancisP@ge

Reel To Reel:
Hellboy

How It Rates: ***
Starring: Ron Perlman, Selma Blair, John Hurt
Rated: PG-13
Red Flags: Copious Violence, Mild Language

Preconceived Notions: Another comic-book movie. But this one seems like a cross between X-Men and Men In Black.
The Bottom Line: Ron Perlman's performance gives an edge to what would otherwise be just another comic-book film.

Hellboy is not, as a coworker jibed, the life of Chris Francis. It is, however, a hell of a picture easily enjoyable by non-fans of the comic-book series from which it emerged.

Hellboy (Perlman) is a demonic creature raised from the underworld by Nazi dabbling in the paranormal gone wrong, a la Raiders Of The Lost Ark. He is adopted by eccentric paranormal expert Dr. Broom (Hurt), who raises him to be more angel than devil as part of a super-secret Bureau Of Paranormal Research and Defense. There are no Men in Black, but there is a fish in blue -- mer-man Abe Sapien (Doug Jones). There's also Liz Sherman, Hellboy's flame in more ways than one. And there's Hellboy's keeper, FBI man Meyers (Rupert Johnson), who's got something for the girl, wouldn't you know.

Perlman's character may file down his horns, but his wisecracks are pinpoint sharp. He enjoys cigars, cats, Baby Ruth candy bars and food in mass quantities (something he must've picked up from a Conehead or two). And while he's stone-fisted, he's also soft-hearted.

Hellboy's mission is stopping the evil Rasputin from bringing about the apocalypse through a wormhole to the dark side of the universe. The first attempt with the Nazis failed, but Hellboy slipped through as a cute little devil. Now Rasputin needs Hellboy's help, notably his repressed evil side, to do it. He also needs the help of hundreds of Alien-esque monsters who only multiply when you kill them.

Director Guillermo del Toro was determined not to let this picture turn into one of his earlier films, the disappointing Mimic. He got his way, and we get an above-average picture out of it. And it's mainly because both del Toro and Perlman realize one key fact: comic-book films, good ones, must possess a human factor we can all relate to. Perlman does a lot of acting under that red suit.

Yet I feel some of the picture's backstory could've been stronger. In the comic-book series, Hellboy is raised with a Christian upbringing, and while there are plenty of hints of it, I didn't think it was set up well enough. I would've liked to have seen more of how Dr. Broom raised "Red" into someone who fights evil while containing the evil within him. I know you have to review a film for what it is, rather than what you want it to be, but I felt there could be more.

More movie reviews on FrancisP@ge

Reel To Reel:
The Ladykillers

How It Rates: ****
Starring: Tom Hanks, Marlon Wayans, Irma P. Hall
Rated: R
Red Flags: Copious F-bombs, Some Sex-Related Dialogue

Preconceived Notions: The Coen brothers return to comedy and snag Tom Hanks to boot. This looks very promising.
The Bottom Line: One of the best caper comedies ever.

Ethan and Joel Coen have proven themselves the plastic men of film, stretching their writing and directing talents amongst goofball comedy (Raising Arizona) to high-brow goofball comedy (Barton Fink, The Hudsucker Proxy) to musical comedy (O Brother, Where Art Thou?) to dark comedy (Fargo) to just plain darkness (Blood Simple, Miller's Crossing).

So when I hear the Coens have a caper film up their sleeve featuring Tom Hanks, it's just another stretch on their rubbery resumes.

And boy, this is some stretch. The Ladykillers is a remake of a classic British caper film featuring Sir Alec Guinness, but transplanted to a Mississippi ghost town which only exists for two reasons: gambling and garbage. A parade of trash barges dump refuge on a heaping island in the river running through town, whose waters also float a riverboat casino.

That casino is the target for con-man professor G.H. Dorr (Tom Hanks), a Colonel Sanders knock-off who's probably conning about his professorships, too. But we're really not sure with the way he performs elevated verbal gymnastics, gliding between poetry and Renaissance music as he cons his way into the home and heart of Marva Munson (Irma P. Hall). She's a no-nonsense churchgoing lady who despises "hippity-hop" music, sends weekly donations to Bob Jones University and lives in the shadow of her late husband, whose portrait perpetually looks down from the fireplace.

Door and his crew have a plan to rob the casino's counting-room, conveniently accessible from Munson's basement, if they're willing to dig. Door's partners in crime include a trash-mouthed homeboy (Wayans) who's the "inside man" at the casino (and whose mouth earns the film an R rating), a blockhead football player who's taken too many tackles, a laconic tunneling expert who could have come from the Viet Cong, and an explosives man with irritable bowel syndrome. Door's cover story for all of this is that they're Renaissance musicians who need a place to rehearse.

The Ladykillers puts a huge weight on Hanks to deliver, and watching him finesse as he finagles is sheer joy. You can watch him work in this film over and over again, like playing your favorite song, and never get tired of it. Hall is a scene-stealer, but wisely, the Coens don't let her make off with this picture. And of course, with everything Coen, the script is the real star, masterfully crafted and full of comic energy, right to the end, even if its supporting players seem a little too exaggerated.

The film is packed with memorable moments and outstanding photography. The soundtrack soulfully blends gospel with that "hippity-hop." You may need to watch the film twice to catch the nuances.

Other critics have complained about this film's cartoonishness, and I would sympathize more if this wasn't a Coen film. Cartoonish qualities seem to be their trademark. Look at O, Brother. Look especially hard at Raising Arizona. Both were embraced for their quirkiness. I can only conclude other reviewers are trying too hard to measure this film against of Guinness' original. Oceans Eleven proved a caper film can be remade with wit, style and new energy. And that's what I see here.

More movie reviews on FrancisP@ge

Reel To Reel:
Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind

How It Rates: ****
Starring: Jim Carrey, Kate Winslet
Rated: R
Red Flags: Language, Sexual Content, Drug Use

Preconceived Notions: A lot of people are going ga-ga about this film featuring Jim Carrey in a serious (but not completely serious) role
The Bottom Line: Well worth the hype -- could be a huge sleeper hit

Many a person would want to get inside Jim Carrey's head for sixty minutes. This film is about as close as you can get, with its dreamlike sequences and sheer unpredictability.

Explaining the plot of this film would rob it of its gush of originality, so I will merely say it revolves around two guys, two girls, a doctor, and a mind-erasing technique to wipe out memories of ex's. But breaking up, as always, is hard to do.

Jim Carrey retreads some of the ground from The Truman Show, playing somebody who's trying to escape from an overwhelming force running his life. Kate Winslet's character seems undaunted by that force, at least we think she is.

Much could have been made of the sci-fi aspects of this story. Some other director might have turned it into another Minority Report set in the year 2033 with a moralizing layer. But director Michel Gondry and company realize this is still a love story, surrealistic as it is. We'll learn the lessons for ourselves and our love lives.

Eternal Sunshine is a great date movie, something to watch with somebody you've known for awhile and you want to hold onto, memories and all.

More movie reviews on FrancisP@ge

Lion In Wait

Say Martha Stewart's going to jail and people start talking. But talk about Arizona Game and Fish planning to shoot mountain lions in Tucson's Sabino Canyon and people reach for their torches and pitchforks. In my four years of producing newscasts in Tucson, I have never seen an evironmental or animal rights issue draw so much debate. And it all comes down to one question: do we really have to kill 'em?

Game and Fish says there's no other solution. These cats will eat you for lunch. It's only a matter of time before somebody gets attacked.

Moving them won't work, we're told. They're territorial. They can't adapt. They can't be put into a zoo. They can't be rehabilitated.

Yeah, but at least they'll still be alive.

Conservation is part of Game and Fish's mission. It's disappointing it can't live with half a loaf. Maybe the cougars can't survive a move, but at least it's a more natural way to go. It's a solution the animal-rights groups can live with, even if the lions can't.

Game and Fish says it put a five-day hold on the lion hunt so it could listen and understand the issues. But it didn't change its mind. The absolute refusal of this agency, funded by your tax money, to even consider testing an alternative solution on one lion is galling. Just move one. If that lion survives, the experts have some explaining to do. If it dies, well, the animal-rights crowd got what it asked for.

This is not bowing to pressure from some group of wackos. This is forcing a public agency to be accountable to the public. Technically, it owns the lions in the eyes of the law, but don't we as citizens own Game and Fish, too?

Reel To Reel:
Secret Window

How It Rates: ***
Starring: Johnny Depp
Rated: PG-13
Red Flags: Violence, Language

Preconceived Notions: Can Depp do it again after Pirates Of The Carribean?
The Bottom Line: He does, even though some may feel jerked around a little.

Johnny Depp appears to be channeling Captain Jack Sparrow in the first 20 minutes of Secret Window. Maybe that was intentional, maybe not. I won't say any more than that, because after the end of the film, reflect back on that observation and judge for yourself.

Depp plays horror writer Mort Rainey who's doing more sleeping than writing as the picture opens (been there, done that). Writers' block has left him a mess, as has a breakup with his wife. He's living in the type of dark musty cabin that horror movies just adore. And here comes a deranged fan, John Shooter (John Turturro), who claims Rainey ripped off a short story he wrote. Secret Window is itself adapted from a novela by Stephen King, and Depp at times resembles the Master of Macabre.

As somebody who knows what it's like to struggle through a novel, Depp has got it down cold. I really don't want to reveal any more about the plot, except that we eventually learn a lot more about Shooter, and he's not simply some psycho.

Suspense films have a lot in common with caper films, and the challenge with both is to construct a mystery and/or con that is both beliveable and suspenseful. For the most part, Secret Window succeeds, but there are things you will still wonder about, when you think back upon them in light of the picture's end. However, I don't think you'll really mind them, and it's because of Depp's performance.

More movie reviews on FrancisP@ge

Do You Know Where You're Going To?

Looks like Diana "Drop In And Out" Ross is going back to jail for not serving her 48-hour DUI sentence all at once... and she'll be locked up in Tucson this time. It sure took long enough for the courts to find out. I had heard off the record a month ago that she had skipped in and out of the pokey after KOLD contacted authorities in Greenwich, CT, where Ross did the time. I only hope the moron who wrote me to complain about us reporting Ross' celebrity treatment is watching. I also wish we could throw her into Joe Arpaio's Maricopa County lock-up for a couple of days. Maybe she could even work on his female chain gang.

Reel To Reel:
Hidalgo

How It Rates: ***
Starring: Viggo Mortensen, Malcolm McDowell, Omar Sharif
Rated: PG-13
Red Flags: Swordplay, Gunplay, A Couple Of Sexual References

Preconceived Notions: Based on a true story, we're told. Filmmakers might cash in on some success of Seabiscuit
The Bottom Line: Entertaining, adventurous yarn about a man, his horse, and the race both of them must survive for honor and money

Many new films can be described as a hybrid of at least two other films. For example, last year's The Last Samurai could be described as Dances With Wolves crossed with Shogun (okay, that was a TV miniseries, but the theory still holds). The Butterfly Effect is Back To The Future minus the funny parts and added to The Thirteenth Floor. And of course, Kill Bill is snippets of other movies remixed.

So the equation for Hidalgo is The Mummy plus The Black Stallion Returns plus Seabiscuit. Here's a mixed-breed film about two mixed breeds: Viggo Mortensen (Lord Of The Rings) as half-Indian Pony Express rider Frank T. Hopkins racing in the ages-old "Ocean Of Fire" with his trusty mixed-breed mustang, Hidalgo. Both know how to go the distance and win cross-country contests.

But one big-shot shiek, who witnesses a washed-up Hopkins in Buffalo Bill's Wild West Show, is less than impressed with the less-than-purebred horse and rider. He throws down a challenge for Hopkins, and soon our heroes are off and running on a 3,000-mile trek across the African desert.

Hidalgo follows the formula of most race or sports films, where winning isn't the point, it's how you win. Hopkins is a likable character whose cowboy grit and craftiness are just too much for his Arab competitors. Count the number of times you hear Mortensen's character labeled "infidel." A real danger of racism lurks within this film, but it doesn't materialize. A couple of ladies are also in the mix -- one a rich Englishwoman who's backing a rider to get presumably richer, the other a shiek's daughter who is a free spirit trapped in a veil.

The title horse does enough acting for an equine Oscar nod. Perhaps he's jealous of Seabiscuit. His reaction shots are fun to watch. And so is Mortensen, who for all his cowboy skill is always on the verge of the last roundup.

If Hidalgo has a downside, it's that the two aforementioned ladies seem like excess baggage. The filmmakers must have thought a 3,000 mile race through the desert pitting an "infidel" against native Bedouin riders wouldn't provide dramatic material. Get the girls out of the movie, focus everything on Hopkins and his horse, and you've got a real winner.

More movie reviews on FrancisP@ge

Reel To Reel:
Starsky & Hutch

How It Rates: ***
Starring: Owen Wilson, Ben Stiller, Snoop Dog
Rated: PG-13
Red Flags: Partial Nudity (half a boob), Language, Homosexual Erotic References, Drug References, Comic-Book Violence

Preconceived Notions: Trailer looked promising. But will this just degrade into another Charlie's Angels 2?
The Bottom Line: Better than you'd expect, not perfect, but a heckuva lot better than many big-screen TV series treatments.

Starsky & Hutch is actually fun without degrading into total dorkiness, and it's a lesson many TV-show movies should've learned from frame one. Owen Wilson is the laid-back Starsky, Ben Stiller is pent-up Hutch, and Snoop Dog is faux-pimp Huggy Bear, their smooth tipster. The cherry red Ford Gran Torino stars as itself.

The cop duo blasts around Bay City trying to bust drug kingpin Reese Feldman (Vince Vaughn) who's developed cocaine undetectible to drug dogs. Naturally, it's undetectible to certain other police characters too, or we wouldn't have a picture.

Banter between the title characters made the 1970's series enjoyable. The film smartly picks up on that, as Owen Wilson just breezes through the picture much like many of his other roles. He doesn't so much fit the part as the part fits him. Ben Stiller has more work cut out. Snoop just plays it cool and smooth... and refreshingly restrained from his drug-and-sex persona, looking more like a playa than the real thing.

Starky & Hutch washes just enough 70's nostalgia over us without making us drown. There is the obligitory scene in a disco, but it's more fun than silly. Owen Wilson even gets to riff on the one-hit wonder of original Hutch, David Soul's "Don't Give Up On Us, Baby."

This film knows how much to push and how much to let ride. But one segment may push some viewers a little far -- a scene where Starsky and Hutch interview a football cheerleader in a locker room as she's changing. She seems oblivious to what the two men in front of her are looking at, and it's definitely no wardrobe malfunction.

More movie reviews on FrancisP@ge

Lost In Admiration

When one film absolutely dominates the Oscars like Lord Of The Rings: The Return Of The King, a lot of great performances deserving of that gold guy go into second-best status. Fortunately, Rings was not nominated in the acting catagories, and deservedly so for what is so thoroughly an ensemble effort.

I've already talked about the two songs from Cold Mountain, but here's my "Shoulda Got It Too" list:

Bill Murray for Lost In Translation -- no knock on Sean Penn, who deserved to win, but something should be on the shelf too for one of the most durable comic actors in the business
Peter Weir for Master And Commander: The Far Side Of The World -- directing a sea adventure as realistic as this one could be a movie in itself
Johnny Depp for Pirates Of The Carribean -- As I wrote in my "Reel To Reel" review, he stepped right off a bottle of Captain Morgan (okay, maybe that bottle was in a gay bar) and into this movie

Hooray For Renee!

Renee Zellweger took the Best Supporting Actress crown for her role as tough farmhand Ruby Deuce in Cold Mountain, and I cheered. I haven't seen an individual performance that enjoyable since Johnny Depp in Pirates Of The Carribean (who was nominated too, but lost honorably to Sean Penn in Mystic River). Zellweger's performance added a huge lift to this film, which I hope more people will see after this win.

Everyone's A Winner

I'm glad I didn't have to vote for the Best Song Oscar. Between the two nominations for tunes from Cold Mountain, one for Return Of The King, and the quirky "Kiss At The End Of The Rainbow" from A Mighty Wind, you had four awesome preformances. But if I had to pick, it would be a tie for the two songs from Cold Mountain with all their sad charm. Maybe because that's because I loved the music from Ken Burns' The Civil War.

One To Win Them All

Did Oscar have a guilt complex for passing on the first two Lord Of The Rings films? I have to think so, with tonight's clean sweep. My other theory is everybody knew from the start there would be three pictures. People were betting that Peter Jackson would save the best for last. He did, and he has been richly rewarded.

Ralph More Democratic Than The Democrats

The man on Democrats' dart boards is running for president again, and predictably, the Dems are whining that he's gonna steal votes, and end up putting Bush back in office.

The nerve of that guy, actually thinking voters should only get to choose between the D's and R's. Terry McAuliffe might as well gripe about the Libertarians. What about all the votes they've gotten from people over the years? Okay, so maybe they didn't take enough to cost somebody an election, but let's look closer at that, shall we?

Ralph Nader did not steal votes. He earned them. A vote for somebody else isn't a mistake, or a throwaway, it's democracy. This whole notion of a wasted, throwaway vote is disgusting to people like me who believe that politics isn't just about winning elections, but standing up to represent those who share common beliefs, goals and concerns. People didn't vote for Ralph Nader in 2000 to screw over Al Gore. He stood for people. He's always stood for people.

So go on Ralph, run. Never mind the gripes from people who want inside-the-box, lightweight, convenient democracy. You won't win, but both major parties will have to work harder. And they simply don't want to.

The Producer Strikes Back

It's more than fashionable to bash news organizations, just like lawyers, HMO's, and the occasional priest. Well, no more. I've decided nobody gets a free bite at the big bad media without me getting to bite back... especially with some of the moron mail I've come across. Chew on this email I got today:

From: (name witheld to protect this bozo's identity, not that he doesn't deserve to get spam-bombed with a few hundred Viagra e-mails)
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 6:45 PM
To: (name witheld to protect the innocent man who came across this first)
Subject: Late Breaking News

I found out tonight that your newsroom really isn't interested in late breaking news. I called a bit after 5PM and informed your newsroom that there had been a fatal accident on Old Spanish Trail within 10 minutes of the accident taking place; a car killed a bicyclist and then rolled. My wife watched it happen and called 911. We didn't see or hear anything about the accident on either the 5 or 6PM news, but lots of canned stories with pretty people. Hey, if you going to be a news source, give us real news as soon you can verify it had happen (like a call to the county sheriff) instead of cute stories on crosses on the side of the road. This convinced me I'm taking my news viewing to channel 4 and hopefully they won't be as disconnected to real local news as your station is. Believe me I'll spread the story of my contact with you to everyone I know at Raytheon.

What's wrong with this picture? Plenty.

1) That bicycle accident Mr. X mentions simply didn't happen. We called two fire departments to check up on it as soon as we got the tip. They were unable to confirm anything. From what we were told, that accident never happened. Verification is standard procedure for every newsroom, and at least Mr. X realizes that. But sometimes, we can't verify things for hours, or even days. That's a mutual subject of frustration. Perhaps Mr. X would be happy if we just threw it on the air cold without bothering to confirm any of it, just to satisfy his impatient posterior.

2) About those "cute stories on crosses on the side of the road." For those of you who didn't see it, reporter Millie Martinez talked to a man who had lost his son, and was honoring him with a white roadside cross... one of thousands across Arizona marking where people have lost loved ones to accidents. She took a closer look at the healing this makeshift memorial provided to a grieving father. Maybe I should hook up this father with Mr. X, so Mr. X can hear the "cute story" of his dead son, and all the pretty pain and glorious grief.

3) I love it when people say something like, "I'm never going to watch your station again!" Then they switch stations and instantly find some fault with that station to gripe about, fire off another e-mail, and the cycle repeats. But come on, switching to KVOA Channel 4? Lie-Witness News? The station that labels six-hour old stories as "Breaking News?" Puh-leeze. It's obvious this guy's clueless.

It is one of Francis' Undisputable Facts that some people have nothing better to do than to find things to complain about. To some degree (putting on my patriot tricorn hat here) that's a sign of a healthy democracy in that these folks have a passion to demand something better. But really, Mr. X, throwing a hissy fit because a station didn't cater to your whim on a single occasion, and then assuming it's because we just want to do "cute" stories is ignorant. That ignorance is multiplied by your cluelessness on the cross story and divided by all those people at Raytheon you're going to tell to stop watching KOLD. Let them watch for themselves and decide, rather than watching you whine and cry.